CFPB Restricts Late Payment Fees Charged by Larger Credit Card Issuers

On March 5th, the CFPB issued a Final Rule to address “excessive” late fees charged by larger card issuers. This includes those, that together with affiliates, had at least one million open credit card accounts at any point during the prior calendar year. Currently, there is a safe harbor in Regulation Z that generally allows card issuers to charge up to $30 (and $41 for repeat violations during the next 6 billing cycles) for violating any terms of a credit card account. This is without regard to the costs incurred by the card issuer. While this Final Rule actually increases these amounts to $32 and $43 (for repeat violations of the same type during the following six billing cycles), it specifically limits the amount large card issuers can charge for late payments.

Larger card issuers are prohibited from charging more than $8 for a late payment, unless they can demonstrate that any higher amount represents a “reasonable proportion” of the costs they incur for late payments. The $8 threshold will not be subject to annual inflation adjustments.

The Rule will go into effect 60 days after being published in the Federal Register.

As seems to be the case with a lot of things lately, on March 7, 2024, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas seeking a preliminary injunction to stop the CFPB from implementing this Final Rule. It believes the Rule punishes responsible credit card users who pay their bills on time. In promulgating its rule to limit credit card late fees, the CFPB not only exceeded its statutory authority but did so by relying on the use of secret data collected for an unrelated purpose.

So, stay tuned!

Lending Resources!

Published
2024/03/08

Diane Dean

Diane joined Banker’s Compliance Consulting with over 10 years of compliance experience and over 15 years of experience within the financial industry. Diane is a Certified Regulatory Compliance Manager (CRCM) and has a Bachelor’s Degree in Sociology with a concentration in Criminal Justice. She is a graduate of the Schools of Banking Compliance School and has participated in various other training opportunities throughout her career. Diane understands firsthand the struggles banks face in building and maintaining successful compliance programs. Her experience and common sense approach to consumer compliance is a great asset to our clients. Diane and her husband have two kids who keep them busy. She enjoys running and other sports and is a big Bugs Bunny fan! She’s a bit crazy in that she does enjoy reading some of these regulations and she’s a “crazy cat lady!” Her cat tales are hilarious!

Recent Posts

Section 1071: Number of Principal Owners

Flood: Relying on A Prior Flood Determination

Knowing Your Customer When Banking Marijuana & Hemp