Regulation E: Authorized vs. Unauthorized EFTs
Regulation E does not define or address what constitutes “fraud”. Rather, it
limits consumer liability for “unauthorized electronic fund transfers”. If a fraudulent transaction meets that definition, you should follow Regulation E but, if it doesn’t, Regulation E does not apply. Regulation E defines an unauthorized electronic fund transfer as:
…an electronic fund transfer from a consumer's account initiated by a person other than the consumer without actual authority to initiate the transfer and from which the consumer receives no benefit…
If your customer initiated a transaction (for example, they entered their account information and hit “send” or “pay now”), whether they were tricked or not, the transaction was authorized. On the other hand, if a scammer tricks a consumer into providing their account login, debit card number, etc., and the scammer subsequently initiates a transaction using that information, the transaction is unauthorized.
Jerod explains more in the video.

Jerod Moyer
Jerod is the leader of Banker’s Compliance Consulting’s training productions. He is a nationally recognized speaker. Whether it’s a conference, seminar, school, webinar or luncheon, it’s easy to stay engaged when he presents due to the amount of passion and energy he brings to each and every compliance topic. Jerod has spoken on behalf of the American Bankers’ Association, BankersOnline, many state banking associations, private compliance groups and financial institutions. He is a Certified Regulatory Compliance Manager (CRCM) and BankersOnline Guru. Jerod likes to spend his time (between reading regulations and producing compliance training!) relaxing at the lake with his wife and three children, following their activities or engaged in something sports-related!